Lately I’ve been concentrating on composing my pictures with some depth. It’s nice to see a sweeping landscape but images have a lot more impact when your eye is made to wander over the image. Here I wanted the viewer to see those beautiful ferns and then to look out at the beach, the Sutro Baths ruins, the rock and finally the sunset.
This focusing technique to ensure the entire image, back to front, is within an acceptable sharpness is called a hyperfocal distance. For this image I focused 2.7′ out because I had an aperture of f/22 and I was at a focal length of 24mm on my 16-35mm lens. How did I know this? Well, there is a long and a short explanation. I’m going the route of the short explanation. 🙂
There is a very succinct webpage that has a chart where you can enter your aperture and focal length so you can find out how far out to focus to ensure an acceptable sharpness back to front. The interactive chart can be found here. If you scroll down you can see the chart which supports both feet and meters. You just enter the format of your camera in the box above the chart, select feet or meters, and then find your aperture and focal length. You’ll see there if you enter my data for this image, which is a 35mm full frame camera, f/22 and 24mm, that the table says I should focus 2.7′.
I included a screen shot of my result. (Note that the narrower your aperture and the wider your focal length, the closer you will focus to the front of your image.)
I hope this helps you achieve sharper images!
September 20, 2016 at 3:10 pm
Thank you for the information.
September 20, 2016 at 3:10 pm
You’re welcome 🙂
September 20, 2016 at 3:21 pm
So beautiful! I think you mastered the DOF on this one, Laura. And I love the green foreground. Everything works together 😊.
September 20, 2016 at 3:25 pm
Thanks so much Pam! I couldn’t resist those ferns. 🙂 I’m going back tonight but with my Nikon and in a different spot.
September 21, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Going back to the same spot! You are really honing your skill 😊.
September 21, 2016 at 4:17 pm
Do t know if I did any better but I’ll post it probably tomorrow. Not many clouds it again! Grrr.
September 20, 2016 at 9:57 pm
Wonderful shot!
September 21, 2016 at 7:23 am
Thank you Rob. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 1:10 am
I love the concept of hyperlocal distance I have used it for some time
September 21, 2016 at 7:22 am
I’m glad you do Raj!
September 21, 2016 at 4:13 am
I love sharpness! If you don’t have access to the web or a chart when shooting scenes like this, live view really helps. Also, one trick, when you just can’t get absolutely 100% of everything in focus is to leave the background a little soft. Much of the time you can fix this in post and even if that isn’t 100%, the eye will tend to “forgive” a little background softness.
September 21, 2016 at 7:25 am
Oh me too. I’m really into it these days lol. Not all shots require that but I find that I’m liking them sharp. But not overly sharp. Seems there is a fine line. I’ve also used the 1/3 out rule when I’m shooting with my 300mm zoom. There’s definitely an acceptable level of sharpness which means that some things are not quite sharp like the background as you mention. It’s amazing what you can sharpen in PP. Thanks so much Rich for geeking out with me. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 9:30 am
Anytime Laura. We photogeeks have to stick together. Keep up the great work!!
September 21, 2016 at 9:56 am
Yes we do!! Thank you! You too, Rich. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 6:01 am
Useful info and a useful resource.
I have a nice little app on my android phone, called Hyperfocal Pro. This gives me a neat diagram with near and far focal distances as well as a similar table.
September 21, 2016 at 7:25 am
That’s cool! I sort of have it memorized a bit now but a great idea to have that on your phone. I hope others see your comment. Thanks!
September 21, 2016 at 6:20 am
Great image, Laura. The illumination of the green ferns makes it extra special.
September 21, 2016 at 7:26 am
Thank you Robin. 🙂 I love those ferns!
September 21, 2016 at 7:45 am
Remarkable shot! Thank your for the info, I need to pay good attention to focus! 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 7:50 am
Thank you Amy. 🙂 I’m trying to do that myself. Sometimes I get very lazy and that’s not a good thing lol.
September 21, 2016 at 7:55 am
You lazy? Never!
September 21, 2016 at 8:00 am
*cough cough*
September 21, 2016 at 9:13 am
😯😉
September 21, 2016 at 8:24 am
Your technical knowledge boggles my brain, Laura. Gorgeous shot!! I do the same thing when I do landscape looking for layers or textures to bring in depth to my image. As for being this exact, my brain doesn’t work like that. I just wing it. I go with my gut instinct and take several shots changing the focal point or the framing with each shot. I know it when I see it and that is how I get my image. If I thought like you, my brain would be in knots. hehehehehehe ❤
September 21, 2016 at 9:56 am
Oh I’m really not all that technical. I try to be though! I love learning stuff like this because I’m lazy and don’t want to get home and see I didn’t get the shot I expected haha. Still lots to learn though! My brain hurts too sometimes. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 10:18 am
Um, gee, you are not lazy, my friend. Techo photography is not my thing but it is yours. I do learn what I have to and go from there … I admit I have so much more to learn. Really!
September 21, 2016 at 11:48 am
Techno photography haha! I love that!
September 21, 2016 at 12:15 pm
You really make me laugh. Thank you! ❤
September 21, 2016 at 12:40 pm
I have that effect on people! Thank you Amy. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 11:07 am
As always a great photograph. Besides my love for B&W I loved to work with depth of field, but my results were not on a par with yours.
September 21, 2016 at 11:49 am
Hi there Pete 🙂 I’m trying to work on this lately. Especially with the wide angles because they lend themselves to that kind of composition. I wish I could see your pictures! Thanks for your comment as always. 🙂
September 21, 2016 at 3:22 pm
Fabulous foreground detail Laura!
September 21, 2016 at 4:12 pm
Thank you! Those ferns were calling my name. Plus they tickled.
September 23, 2016 at 5:43 am
He he 😉 I love walking through the undergrowth as long as there’s no brambles!!
September 23, 2016 at 10:36 am
Fortunately I was in a clearing!
September 26, 2016 at 4:59 pm
😀
September 21, 2016 at 6:07 pm
I’m going to try this on my next venture. Thanks so much for the information
September 21, 2016 at 7:46 pm
You’re welcome! Let me know how it goes.
September 21, 2016 at 7:41 pm
Awesome post Laura and fantastic image.
September 21, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Thanks so much!
September 22, 2016 at 8:37 pm
BIG fave on this one.
September 23, 2016 at 10:33 am
Thanks so much! I love those ferns!
September 25, 2016 at 1:55 am
Ah, great image and very interesting post. I normally use my workaround: 2 images – one focused on foreground, one on the background and merge them in PS. I have to try that one in the next days, Laura. Thanks for sharing.
September 25, 2016 at 8:20 am
I do that too sometimes if I’m using a longer focal length lens. It doesn’t usually work as well with a long lens if you’re trying to get that in your face (so to speak) foreground like the ferns. Just fyi! I’m glad you liked the image. 🙂
October 1, 2016 at 4:56 am
Thank you very much for the link to the chart 😀😀
October 1, 2016 at 7:24 am
You’re welcome! Hope it helps!
October 4, 2016 at 5:13 am
Thanks for the information. I forget about it sometimes. Also thanks for the chart
October 4, 2016 at 8:03 am
You’re welcome!
October 16, 2016 at 2:42 pm
it was so much easier when lenses had that information on them, you could just pick your minimum distance and see what the maximum was at any full f-stop. I used to shoot that way all the time, now I just shoot wide and don’t worry as I never remember those numbers. A really great photo Laura. 🙂 Now that I am back to healthy (knocking on wood) and have tethered internet at home, I’ll be able to keep up better.
October 16, 2016 at 8:28 pm
I’m glad you’re feeling better! Good to see you here robert. Thanks so much for stopping by. 😀